- Introduction
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
- Comparing Performance of Datasets With PCA Applied
- References

The type of Unsupervised learning which is quite interesting is dimensionality reduction. It results in the reduction of dimensions of data hence in effect reduces data size as well.

There are major 2 types of dimensionality reduction techniques.

**Linear Projection of Data (Principal Component Analysis, Independent Component Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis, etc. )****Non-Linear Projection of Data (Manifold Learning - Isomap, TSNE, SpectralEmbedding, MDS, LocallyLinearEmbedding)**

We'll be discussing Linear Dimensionality Reduction in this tutorial (PCA) and algorithms available for it in scikit-learn. We'll not go much into theoretical depth of concept but will try to explain the usage of algorithms available in scikit-learn about it.

We'll start by importing related libraries.

```
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import sklearn
import sys
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
print("Python Version : ",sys.version)
print("Scikit-Learn Version : ",sklearn.__version__)
%matplotlib inline
```

PCA is a linear projection of data into new feature space different from the original one. In PCA, We find new features for representing data which linear combinations of old data but less in terms of dimensions. One can also say that we rotate data into a new feature space with fewer dimensions.

The main concept behind PCA is to reduce the dimensions of data while capturing most of the information of data. PCA finds these features by looking at the direction of maximum variance and keeping only features which present maximum variance in data. It results in finding a dataset which is low in size but still possess the same information as that of the original dataset.

It helps in the reduction of computation time for ML algorithms, reduction of storage memory, and also helps to fight "Curse of Dimensionality".

Below we are loading the IRIS dataset which comes as default with the sklearn package. It returns Bunch object which is almost the same as the dictionary. We'll also print details about the dataset.

```
from sklearn import datasets
iris = datasets.load_iris()
print('Dataset features names : '+str(iris.feature_names))
print('Dataset features size : '+str(iris.data.shape))
print('Dataset target names : '+str(iris.target_names))
print('Dataset target names : '+str(iris.target.shape))
X_iris, Y_iris = iris.data, iris.target
```

Below we are visualizing our data by using a scatter plot which shows the relationship between two attributes of data `(sepal length - X-axis vs petal width- Y-axis)`

. One can also try different combinations of attributes of data to see how they are related. We also have color-encoded classes.

```
with plt.style.context(('ggplot','seaborn')):
plt.figure(figsize=(15,6))
plt.subplot(121)
for i,c in [(0,'red'),(1,'green'),(2,'blue')]:
plt.scatter(iris.data[iris.target==i,0],iris.data[iris.target==i,3], c=c, s=40, marker='s', label=iris.target_names[i])
plt.xlabel(iris.feature_names[0])
plt.ylabel(iris.feature_names[3])
plt.legend(loc='best')
plt.title('Visualizing Dataset')
```

Below we'll initialize 2 different versions of PCA (One with 2 components and another with 3 components). We'll then fit data to both of these models. Here `n_components`

parameter refers to a number of features we want into a transformed dataset.

```
from sklearn import decomposition
pca2 = decomposition.PCA(n_components=2)
pca3 = decomposition.PCA(n_components=3)
pca2.fit(X_iris), pca3.fit(X_iris)
```

Once a model has been fit to data, it can then be used to transform the dataset into a new dimensional space defined as a number of components when initializing the model. We'll create 2 transformed datasets(one with 2 features and one with 3 features) from the original IRIS dataset.

```
X_iris_pca2 = pca2.transform(X_iris)
X_iris_pca3 = pca3.transform(X_iris)
print('New Dataset size after transformations : ', X_iris_pca2.shape, X_iris_pca3.shape)
```

We'll try to visualize both transformed datasets using scatter charts and color-encode them using flower class. It'll help us understand whether the transformed dataset also has the same spread of data as that of the original.

```
fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(8, 6))
colors = ['red','green','blue']
markers = ['s','^','o']
with plt.style.context(('seaborn','ggplot')):
for iris_class in range(3):
plt.scatter(X_iris_pca2[Y_iris==iris_class,0],X_iris_pca2[Y_iris==iris_class,1],\
c=colors[iris_class], label=iris.target_names[iris_class], marker=markers[iris_class], s=50, alpha=0.5)
plt.legend(loc="best")
plt.title('Scatter Plot of Feature-1 vs Feauter-2 color-encoded by flower class')
plt.xlabel("New Feature 1")
plt.ylabel("New Feature 2")
```

```
fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(8, 6))
ax = Axes3D(fig)
colors = ['red','green','blue']
markers = ['s','^','o']
with plt.style.context(('seaborn','ggplot')):
for iris_class in range(3):
ax.scatter3D(X_iris_pca3[Y_iris==iris_class,0],X_iris_pca3[Y_iris==iris_class,1],X_iris_pca3[Y_iris==iris_class,2], \
c=colors[iris_class], label=iris.target_names[iris_class], marker=markers[iris_class], s=50, alpha=0.5)
ax.legend(loc="best")
ax.set_title('3D Scatter Plot color-encoded by flower class')
ax.set_xlabel(iris.feature_names[0])
ax.set_ylabel(iris.feature_names[1])
ax.set_zlabel(iris.feature_names[2])
ax.view_init(10, -60);
```

It represents the direction of maximum variance in data.`components_`

The amount of variance explained by each component.`explained_variance_`

The percentage of variance explained by each component.`explained_variance_ratio_`

It represents singular values for each components.`singular_values_`

It represents estimated noise covariance.`noise_variance_`

```
print("PCA(2-Components) components : ", pca2.components_)
print("PCA(3-Components) components: ", pca3.components_)
```

```
print("PCA(2-components) explained variance:",pca2.explained_variance_)
print("PCA(3-components) explained variance:",pca3.explained_variance_)
```

```
print("PCA(2-components) explained variance ratio:",pca2.explained_variance_ratio_)
print("PCA(3-components) explained variance ratio:",pca3.explained_variance_ratio_)
```

```
print("PCA(2-components) singular values :",pca2.singular_values_)
print("PCA(3-components) singular values :",pca3.singular_values_)
```

```
print("PCA(2-components) noise variance :",pca2.noise_variance_)
print("PCA(3-components) noise variance :",pca3.noise_variance_)
```

We'll try PCA on digits datasets as well which is available in the scikit-learn library. We'll be loading only 6 classes instead of loading all 10-classes of digits as it'll help us clearly see classes in plotted data. Below we are loading digits dataset which is readily available in sklearn.

```
digits = datasets.load_digits(n_class=6)
X_digits, Y_digits = digits.data, digits. target
print('Dataset Size : ', X_digits.shape, Y_digits.shape)
```

Please make a note that the digits dataset has 64 features as each image is of size 8x8 pixels.

We'll be transforming digits dataset to 2-features and 3-features dataset from 64 features dataset which is quite a big reduction in the size of data. We'll also lose some important information when decreasing dataset features by such margin and will impact our classification accuracy as well in the future.

We are using the `fit_transform()`

method available for PCA to perform both fit and transform functionalities together.

```
X_digits_pca2 = pca2.fit_transform(X_digits)
X_digits_pca3 = pca3.fit_transform(X_digits)
print('Transformed Data sizes : ', X_digits_pca2.shape, X_digits_pca3.shape)
```

Below we are using scatter charts to visualize 2-features and 3-features PCA transformed digits datasets. We have also color-encoded each digit to differentiate them from one another.

```
with plt.style.context(('seaborn','ggplot')):
fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(10, 5))
colors = ['red','green','yellow','blue','purple','cyan','magenta', 'firebrick', 'lawngreen','indigo']
for digit in range(0,6):
plt.scatter(X_digits_pca2[Y_digits==digit,0],X_digits_pca2[Y_digits==digit,1], c = colors[digit], marker="$"+str(digit)+"$",s =50, alpha=0.5)
plt.xlabel("New Feature 1")
plt.ylabel("New Feature 2")
plt.title('Scatter Plot representing various digits')
```

We can clearly see that classes are still separate from each other even after dimensionality reduction. It seems that PCA has tried to maintain as much information about the dataset even after doing a reduction in a number of features.

```
fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(10, 8))
ax = Axes3D(fig)
colors = ['red','green','yellow','blue','purple','cyan','magenta', 'firebrick', 'lawngreen','indigo']
with plt.style.context(('seaborn','ggplot')):
for digit in range(6):
ax.scatter3D(X_digits_pca3[Y_digits==digit,0],X_digits_pca3[Y_digits==digit,1],X_digits_pca3[Y_digits==digit,2], \
c=colors[digit], marker="$"+str(digit)+"$", s=50, alpha=0.5)
ax.view_init(10, -60)
ax.set_title('3D Scatter Plot color-encoded by digits')
ax.set_xlabel('Feature 1')
ax.set_ylabel('Feature 2')
ax.set_zlabel('Feature 3')
```

Make a note that we determined these new features without any information about labels of data, hence it's unsupervised learning. PCA gives insight into the distribution of data for different classes.

Below we are checking the performance of LinearRegression and KNeighborsClassifier models on original IRIS and digits datasets as well as on PCA transformed datasets to see whether the decrease in dimensions has resulted in the loss of information which impacts the performance of classifier a lot.

We have created a generic method that takes as input classifier and dataset along with the target. It then splits the dataset into train/test sets, fit classifier into train data, and evaluate the test set. It also prints the model's performance on both train and test sets.

```
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
def test_model(classifier, X, Y):
X_train, X_test, Y_train, Y_test = train_test_split(X, Y, train_size=0.80, test_size=0.20, stratify=Y, random_state=123)
print("Dataset Size : ",sys.getsizeof(X),"bytes, Shape : ", X_train.shape, X_test.shape, Y_train.shape, Y_test.shape)
classifier.fit(X_train, Y_train)
print('Train Accuracy : %.2f, Test Accuracy : %.2f'%(classifier.score(X_train, Y_train), classifier.score(X_test, Y_test)))
def compare_accuracy_of_various_techniques(classifier):
print("Iris dataset performance without PCA :")
test_model(classifier, X_iris, Y_iris)
print("\nIris dataset performance with PCA(2 components) :")
test_model(classifier, X_iris_pca2, Y_iris)
print("\nIris dataset performance with PCA(3 components) :")
test_model(classifier, X_iris_pca3, Y_iris)
print("\nDigits dataset performance without PCA :")
test_model(classifier, X_digits, Y_digits)
print("\nDigits dataset performance with PCA(2 components) :")
test_model(classifier, X_digits_pca2, Y_digits)
print("\nDigits dataset performance with PCA(3 components) :")
test_model(classifier, X_digits_pca3, Y_digits)
```

```
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
classifier = LogisticRegression(solver='newton-cg',multi_class='auto')
compare_accuracy_of_various_techniques(classifier)
```

```
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
classifier = KNeighborsClassifier()
compare_accuracy_of_various_techniques(classifier)
```

We can notice from the above analysis that the accuracy of the DIGITS dataset is impacted quite more compared to that of the IRIS dataset after performing dimensionality reduction using PCA. We had reduced the size of DIGITS by quite a margin which has resulted in a loss of information. One can decide how many components to use as a parameter of PCA by checking model accuracy on a various number of features.

We can also use PCA Component Explained Variance Chart to decide how many features we can let go which will not result in information getting lost. The PCA components explained variance chart let us know how much of the original data variance is contained within first `n_components`

.

This ends our small tutorial introducing the usage of PCA using scikit-learn. Please feel free to let us know your views in the comments section.

When going through coding examples, it's quite common to have doubts and errors.

If you have doubts about some code examples or are stuck somewhere when trying our code, send us an email at **coderzcolumn07@gmail.com**. We'll help you or point you in the direction where you can find a solution to your problem.

You can even send us a mail if you are trying something new and need guidance regarding coding. We'll try to respond as soon as possible.

If you want to

- provide some suggestions on topic
- share your views
- include some details in tutorial
- suggest some new topics on which we should create tutorials/blogs